UK Casinos Not on GamStop in 2026: The Offshore Options Your Phone Can Reach

Updated November 2026

Licensed

Available in GB

Fast payouts

18+ Only

The head keyword phrase “uk casinos not on gamstop” describes sites holding no Gambling Commission licence, so the national self-exclusion scheme does not apply to them. Gamstop Online had 614,738 people on its register as of July 2026; a small share of British players look elsewhere. Here is how that market actually behaves.

The scheme’s own figures explain why the question exists. In the first half of 2026 Gamstop Online reported a 16 per cent year-on-year rise in registrations, with May setting a monthly record of 12,236, and under-25s made up nearly one in three of those sign-ups. A register that size is a large pool of people who cannot open an account with any operator licensed in Great Britain. Some of them go looking for a site that sits outside the scheme. That is the market I am describing here, and in 2026 it is bigger, better marketed and more mobile than it was five years ago.

Two things need saying before anything else, because everything later depends on them. First, offshore sites are not licensed in Great Britain, and UK protections simply do not follow a player to them. This page is a description of a market and of how to read it, not a recommendation to join it. Second, self-exclusion is not something a change of website undoes: a Gamstop registration holds for its full term, 6 months, 1 year, 5 years or 5 years with auto-renewal, and it then stays in place until the person contacts Gamstop to remove it. Where to get help is at the bottom of this page, and it appears twice for a reason: GamCare’s National Gambling Helpline, 0808 8020 133, free, 24 hours a day.

What Almost Every Ill-Informed Guide Calls These Places

Every guide in this niche — mine included — slides into the same shorthand: a “not on GamStop casino”. Treat the phrase as a description of a licensing gap, not a product category. These are casinos that hold a licence somewhere else. The word “casino” is doing the work and the licence is doing nothing.

Coverage of the two common routes has been careless in the same direction. Curaçao spent 2025 and 2026 rebuilding a regime that had been a master-licence carousel for decades, and the old seal on a footer proves nothing now. A brand still showing a legacy /JAZ number or an orange sub-licence certificate has not been independently verified as holding a current Curaçao licence. Anjouan is the other favourite, cheap and fast to obtain; a licence there is not a passport either, and the authority itself said as much publicly in June 2026.

Then there is fidelity, which the market talks about constantly and which the word “uk” in a domain name does nothing to establish.

UK Casinos Not on GamStop and the Two Years That Rewrote the Rules

Judging an offshore operator means knowing what the standard looks like from the inside. The past two years changed British licensed play more than any period since the scheme went live on 27 April 2018, and the changes run straight into the comparison anyone makes on a phone.

The first is price of failure. On 19 January 2026 the wagering cap arrived: a licensee may not require a customer to play through bonus funds more than 10 times. The Commission chose that number over an outright ban and said plainly that it “will take out extreme levels as some licensees currently apply up to 60 times wagering requirements”. Of all the rules in force, that single figure is the cleanest yardstick for measuring what an offshore offer actually costs the person who takes it.

The second is friction at the start. Since 31 October 2025 every licensed operator must prompt a customer to set a financial limit before a first deposit, present that as the default and make the customer take a positive step to decline it. Slots stakes are capped at £5 per game cycle for everyone, and £2 for 18 to 24s, since April and May 2025. Credit cards have been banned for licensed gambling since 14 April 2020.

The third is odd but revealing: since April 2020, licensed operators have had to check their entire customer base against the register at least once every 24 hours. Which is why a Gamstop restriction is a fact of the account rather than a promise, and why an offshore site is never a way round it — it is simply a site that does not ask.

Where the Money Actually Leaves, in Method Order

Withdrawals are where the two markets differ in something anyone can count. The table below runs by payment method, because that is how a phone-holding player experiences it. The Great Britain figures come from the Commission’s data covering June to September 2024: 44.2 million withdrawals by customers of large online operators, of which 96.3 per cent cleared automatically, 3.5 per cent within 24 hours and 0.1 per cent within up to 48 hours.

Read down the last three rows and the story changes. Crypto is the favourite rail of the offshore trade and it is fast, but it is also the rail on which a stunned player discovers that a payment failed because the receiving address had no Energy, or that six confirmations took forty minutes. And the fiat rows contain the small detail that matters most: a licensed operator may charge a cost-reflective processing fee and may reasonably limit the size or number of separate withdrawals, but may not impose any maximum limit on the amount withdrawable from a deposit balance. Terms of the shape “you may withdraw up to £50 per day and up to £500 per week” are prohibited here. They are routine in the offshore market.

Bonus Terms That Still Trap Players

The strongest argument in the offshore sales pitch is the absence of the £5 slots stake cap and of the 10x wagering ceiling. The strongest argument against it is what fills the space where those rules were.

Start with the arithmetic. A UK-licensed welcome offer may require at most ten times the bonus in play-through. Offshore, the multipliers that reach the public run higher: a comparison table compiled in 2026 put welcome-bonus wagering typically at 35x to 50x and no-deposit bonuses at 40x to 60x with a €50 to €100 cashout cap, and trade coverage describes offshore welcome offers as commonly 25x to 40x. Both of those ranges are [unconfirmed] — they are the trade’s own numbers rather than a regulator’s — so treat them as a direction of travel, not a schedule.

Then the contribution rules, which convert a headline multiplier into a bigger real one. One operator’s published chart gives slots and specialty games 100 per cent contribution, video poker and blackjack 10 per cent, roulette and baccarat 5 per cent, and craps, jackpots and live dealer 0 per cent. Playing blackjack through a 40x bonus therefore costs, in wagering terms, four hundred times the bonus.

The third layer is the clause that turns a good session into an argument. Maximum cashout terms are standard: one operator reserves the right to limit bonus-generated winnings to 300 per cent of the credited bonus, voiding the excess. Another opens with the line that deposit bonuses are calculated on the bonus, not the deposit, and that “the deposit amount itself is not included in the wagering calculation”. Maximum bet while wagering is overseen by a rule too, and one published example caps bets at 20 per cent of the deposited amount and states that ignoring it may mean account closure and forfeiture of the bonus and any winnings generated while wagering it. Bonus abuse clauses then define low-margin or zero-risk bets, moving between weighted games after a win, and delaying free spins until wagering is met, as abuse — and another operator says the penalty may reach permanent account closure.

None of that is fraud, and the terms are published. The point is that a player who does not read them has agreed to all of it, in a jurisdiction where no one has to write them differently.

The Role of Identity Checks in Mobile Gambling

If a single mechanism decides whether a mobile casino experience is pleasant or miserable, it is when identity is checked.

A licensed operator runs versions of this. Under Licence Condition 17 it must obtain and verify a customer’s identity before that customer is permitted to gamble, and it should tell customers before a first deposit what documents may be needed, in what circumstances and in what form. In remote casinos the anti-money-laundering regulations bite at a €2,000 threshold, and the threshold approach applies to a single transaction or to transactions that appear linked — for example the same customer in the same logged-on period. Remote casinos may identify a customer and verify age at registration and defer full verification to that threshold; the Commission calls it the hybrid approach, and it is why a first withdrawal is sometimes where a request for documents lands.

The Commission’s position is that a withdrawal should not be the moment verification is sprung. Licence Condition 17.1.1 says a withdrawal request must not result in a requirement for additional information if the licensee could reasonably have requested it earlier, with a carve-out only for what another legal duty, such as an anti-money-laundering rule, forces it to seek at that time. It also says a delay caused by insufficient identity information may be a breach of Licence Condition 17.

Offshore, the same check has no schedule and often no address. Where a site is licensed, the regime may say something sensible and hollow: Curaçao’s published standards require segregated player funds, certified random number generators and AML controls, and Anjouan’s require fund segregation, certified RNGs, AML and age verification. Enforceable by whom is the unanswered half of that sentence.

The warning signs to watch for are the shape of the question, not the fact of it. A request for a passport and a utility bill after a first withdrawal, from a site that asked nothing on deposit, is the classic. Repeated requests for the same document are another. So is a request for source of wealth before any sizeable play, or an amended identity — a middle name where a forename belongs — which the Commission has warned creates mismatches with records held elsewhere, including the register.

Five Signs an Offshore Operator Can Be Trusted With a Phone

None of these settles the licensing question, because nothing outside a British licence does. Each tells whether an operator is behaving like a licensed one.

The Licence Checks Out Where It Is Claimed

Not a footer seal — the register behind it. Curaçao issues a Certificate of Operation Seal only to B2C operators and only for an approved player-facing domain, and clicking it must redirect to cert.cga.cw. If the seal differs in design, colour or format, the site is not authorised; if the certificate behind it names a different domain, that certificate belongs to another operator. The quick check: tap the seal on the phone and read the domain on the certificate that opens. If it does not match the address bar, stop.

Withdrawal Terms Are Stated Before a Deposit, Without a Cap

Look for the payout section of the terms, not the bonus page. In Great Britain the prohibited example is “You may withdraw up to £50 per day and up to £500 per week”, and operators are also barred from using terms that reserve sole discretion to void or withhold winnings, because such terms are unfair under the Consumer Rights Act 2015. The quick check: search the terms on the phone for the words “maximum”, “per day” and “per week” near “withdraw”. A cap on withdrawals from a deposit balance is the single clearest warning on any casino site.

Complaints Go Somewhere Independent and Free

A real alternative dispute resolution provider, named in the terms, free to the customer, and reachable after the operator’s own process has run. Under the Commission’s rules a licensee must have arrangements to refer an unresolved dispute to an ADR entity free of charge if it is not settled within eight weeks, and consumers generally must have been through the internal procedure first. The approved list here includes IBAS, eCOGRA, CEDR and ProMediate. Offshore, the equivalents vary: Anjouan requires licensees to nominate an approved ADR provider and resolve complaints within 30 days before escalation, and Kahnawake employs a full-time dispute resolution officer. The quick check: search the terms for “dispute” and see whether a named third party appears, or only an email address.

The Operator Has Been Disrupted, or Has Not

A site the Commission’s Illegal Markets team has acted against has a public record. Since April 2024 the Commission has issued 3,140 cease and desist and disruption notices, comprising 2,032 C&Ds, 774 registrar referrals, 402 host referrals and 3 payment provider referrals, referred 447,778 Bing and Google URLs and secured 287,961 URL removals. Measured across 160 illegal gambling websites, engagement fell by an average of 32 per cent after disruption. The quick check: search the site’s name alongside “cease and desist” or “Gambling Commission warning” and read what comes back. Absence of a record is not a clean bill of health; presence of one is decisive.

Player Funds Are Segregated and the Rating Is Disclosed

A licensed operator must hold customer funds in a separate client bank account, must choose one of three published ratings — “not protected”, “medium protection” or “high protection” — and must state which applies in its terms; if “not protected”, it must remind the customer once every six months, stating the value of funds held. Anjouan’s standards require segregation too. The quick check: read the customer-funds clause and note the rating, then remember the statute’s own warning — a separate client account does not mean the money comes back if the business fails, and the account may be overseas.

How to Judge an Offshore Casino Without Gambling a Penny

A careful player can do all of this in twenty minutes with a phone and nothing at stake. Five steps, each with the reason it earns its place.

1. Find the licence number, then find the authority’s register. Go to the regulator named in the footer and search its public list for the domain. The reason: a licence number in a footer is a claim; a register entry is a fact. Curaçao’s own policy is that a legacy /JAZ number must not be treated as proof of a current licence, and its portal for verifying domains was out of service as of October 2026, so an operator should be able to say how it is verified.

1. Read the withdrawal section of the terms before the bonus section. Look for caps, processing fees, a limit on the number of pending requests, and any wording about discretion. The reason: this is where an unlicensed-style business hides its costs. Manual review of every fifth or tenth withdrawal, and a term allowing only one withdrawal request at a time, were among the findings behind a £900,000 settlement in October 2026.

1. Check the bonus maths against the 10x benchmark. Multiply the multiplier by the game weighting before deciding whether the offer is generous. The reason: contribution weights are the difference between a 40x bonus and an effective 400x one, and a maximum cashout clause can void everything above a stated ceiling.

1. Read the dispute clause and locate the named ADR provider. Then check whether the provider’s own rules allow it to hear the dispute at all: eCOGRA may refuse where two weeks have not passed since the problem began, or where the dispute arose more than a year ago. The reason: an approval list is not a promise to accept a case.

1. Set a financial limit on the account, or decline it deliberately on the day the site prompts. Since 31 October 2025 licensed operators must present a limit as the default and make declining a positive act; offshore, the prompt may exist and mean less. The reason: the limit is the only control the site cannot argue with later.

1. Install blocking software on the phone as well. Gamstop signposts Gamban and BetBlocker; BetBlocker states it blocks over 1,368,000 gambling websites and 3,100 apps, needs no registration and is free worldwide, while Gamban is free for residents of Wales and, after TalkBanStop funding ended on 31 March 2026, costs £4.99 a month or £29.99 a year in England and Scotland. The reason: the scheme covers only operators licensed in Great Britain, so the exclusion that holds for its full term and stays until Gamstop is asked to lift it does not reach a site that never joined.

Casinos Not on GamStop in 2026 Using New Names

The market moves faster than the paperwork. Judging by what the trade tracks, Curaçao licences numbered in the hundreds as of late 2026, and the churn among domains is constant: the Commission referred 1,835 websites to search engines in July to September 2026 alone, against 366 in the previous quarter. New brands appear on new domains with the same game suppliers behind them.

That rebuilding is why “new” is a weak proxy for anything. A site launched last month may hold a provisional Curaçao licence that expired on 24 December 2025 and may never have converted. And the geography of trust keeps shifting: in May 2025 the Commission said one operator was leaving the Great Britain market, that the sites it ran were now unlicensed and might not provide protections against criminality or gambling-related harm, and that five football clubs had been contacted about sponsorship arrangements with unlicensed gambling businesses.

Live Casino Not on GamStop With Fewer People Watching

Live dealer tables are the format that proves the point about where the rules stop. Studio blackjack and roulette stream identically whether the licence is British, Curaçao or Anjouan; the difference is in the contribution table, where one operator’s published terms give live dealer games 0 per cent contribution to bonus wagering, and in the maximum bet rule, where a bet above the limit may mean forfeiture of the bonus and the winnings made with it.

There is a structural reason for the tightness. Our own licensed studios already know they are competing for table time against an unlicensed room, and the pinched economics of live tables push offshore and even licensed operators towards the same standard: fewer bets, counted more carefully, with the small print doing the counting. The honest version of the comparison, for a player who cares about the game rather than the badge, is that the game is the same and the person deciding whether the payout stands is not.

UK Casino Apps and the Store Shelf

Apps are where this topic gets practical for anyone who plays mainly on a phone. A licensed casino app reaches an iPhone through a British App Store account and an Android phone through Google Play, and stores enforce their own rules on gambling apps, including age rating and a link to the helpline in the listing. An offshore operator that cannot pass those checks sends players to a browser page or offers an APK file outside the store, which is where permit-free sideloading lives.

That is the fork. The store is not a regulator and says so, but it does filter developers and it does publish a listing that names the operator. An APK from a redirect on a social ad tells you nothing about who holds the licence, who handles a withdrawal complaint, or what happens to the account when the domain expires. On a phone, in a hurry, that difference is the whole market.

Phone Payments That Still Work

The rails matter more than the badges, and two of them have recently changed in ways that catch people out.

Card deposits still fail for gambling on a British account, because the ban has been in force since 14 April 2020, and the rule reaches further than most players realise: where a site accepts money from an e-wallet, it must ensure that money was not loaded from a credit card, and it may only accept payment from Great Britain customers by a method whose provider is a payment service provider under the Payment Services Regulations 2017. Carriers are not payment service providers on that reading, which is the quiet reason “pay by phone bill” has thinned out at licensed operators. The phrase still circulates in search because the offshore market accepts it, sometimes billed as a “pay by phone bill” casino not on GamStop; what the player is buying there is a mobile-billing intermediary, not a protected payment.

PayPal remains the payment the market talks about most and supplies least. Withdrawing a personal PayPal balance to a UK bank account carries no fee where no currency conversion is involved, but the list of licensed operators accepting it is short, and an offshore casino advertising “casinos not on Gamstop UK PayPal” is usually describing an intermediary option rather than a direct account route.

Bank gambling blocks are the other side of the same coin. The Commission’s list, last updated 16 October 2026, names Bank of Scotland, Barclays, Halifax, HSBC, Lloyds, MBNA, Monzo, NatWest, Royal Bank of Scotland, Santander and Starling. They work by declining payments to gambling merchant category codes, cover online casinos, betting sites, gaming apps and physical venues, and are applied at card level, so each card needs activating. Most banks impose a 48-hour or 72-hour cooling-off period before gambling transactions are permitted again, and the block does not touch a credit score. There is a plain, non-obvious reason these blocks and offshore sites sit in the same paragraph: a bank block is the one control that works on a site the scheme does not reach.

Casinos Free Spins No Deposit Not on GamStop and Their Real Cost

No-deposit offers are where the two markets are furthest apart, and where “free” costs the most.

In Great Britain the constraints are structural. From 19 January 2026 a licensed operator may not put more than ten times the bonus into a wagering requirement, may not mix more than one type of gambling product into a single incentive — the Commission’s own illustration is that “Bet £5 to get a £10 free bet” is compliant while “Bet £5 to get 20 free spins” is not — and must set out terms that are clear, transparent, fair and readily accessible, with significant conditions no more than one click away.

Offshore, the same offer arrives with numbers attached that would not be permitted here: no-deposit multipliers at 40x to 60x against a €50 to €100 cashout cap in one 2026 comparison, free bonuses that cannot be redeemed consecutively, and a rule at one operator that if a deposit is made while a no-deposit bonus is active, the wagering requirement and the maximum cash-out of the free bonus still apply to everything. The Commission’s warning notice of 20 January 2025 put the two facts together: unlicensed sites often target customers who have excluded through the scheme, and may have inadequate social responsibility and anti-money-laundering controls.

Payment Methods the Offshore Market Declines, and Why

The financial pressure is real and it is aimed precisely at these sites. The Commission made its first referral to Visa in January 2025 after a test purchase on an unlicensed site, and has since made three more covering three separate websites, describing payment transaction data as a critical and still early-stage part of its disruption strategy. Its Illegal Markets team counts registrar blocks and website suspensions as its most effective tools, producing average engagement falls of 91 per cent each, ahead of GEO IP blocking at 60 per cent.

Which means the practical question — what payment methods does this operator take — is also a question about how long the account will last. Sites that lose card rails move to crypto, and crypto brings its own accounting: a USDT transfer on TRON to a wallet that already holds USDT consumes about 65,000 Energy, and about 130,000 Energy to a brand-new wallet, which without staked Energy means roughly 13 TRX burned in the first case and 26 TRX in the second. Ethereum runs on the same logic without the shortcut — a standard transfer is exactly 21,000 units of gas, priced in gwei where 1 gwei is one-billionth of an ETH, and the fee is charged whether the transaction succeeds or fails.

A Note on the Numbers the Trade Quotes

The illegal market’s size is the most contested figure in this corner of the subject, and anyone quoting it precisely is overselling. The Commission’s analysis published 5 November 2026 estimates that, across the whole population including non-gamblers, 0.6 per cent of respondents engaged with illegal gambling websites in the past four weeks and a further 0.4 per cent in the past 12 months, while among respondents who had gambled online in the past four weeks the figure rises to 2.5 per cent. Its dashboard recorded 586 illegal gambling websites accessible to Great Britain consumers in September 2026, 4 per cent more than a year earlier.

The trade estimates disagree with each other by an order of magnitude. H2 Gambling Capital put the amount staked with illegal operators in the UK at £16.6 billion in 2025, up from about £5 billion in 2019. A Frontier Economics study for the Betting and Gaming Council conservatively estimated £2.7 billion staked annually online on the black market, 2.1 per cent of the £128 billion staked with regulated remote casino, betting and bingo operators. Yield Sec, analysing for the Campaign for Fairer Gambling, split £8.8 billion in gross gaming revenue as 91 per cent regulated and 9 per cent unregulated. None of these are neutral.

The licensed baseline is firmer. Great Britain’s total gambling gross gambling yield was £17.5 billion in the year April 2025 to March 2026, up 4.4 per cent, of which the remote casino, betting and bingo sector accounted for £8.3 billion, up 6.9 per cent. The remote casino sector was rated high risk for money laundering in the Commission’s 2026 assessment, unchanged from the previous year, with gross gambling yield of £5.0 billion in April 2024 to March 2025, £4.2 billion of it from slots.

There is one more number worth holding onto when the subject turns to enforcement. Since the Gambling Act 2005 came into force on 1 September 2007, the section 33 offence of providing facilities for gambling without an operating licence has been an offence by the operator, not the player. The Act’s general gambling offences attach to those who provide the facilities. It is immaterial whether the facilities are provided wholly or partly by remote communication, and whether inside or outside the United Kingdom. And the penalties stay modest: a maximum of 51 weeks on summary conviction, a fine, or both — a cost that many offshore operations appear to treat as a licence fee of its own.

UK-Licensed Casinos Not on GamStop as a Contradiction

The phrase belongs in the catalogue of search results, and it is worth naming plainly because someone reading a list of results deserves to know it is empty. Every online operator licensed by the Gambling Commission has been required to participate in the national multi-operator self-exclusion scheme as a condition of that licence since 31 March 2020, under social responsibility code provision 3.5.5, which reads simply that licensees “must participate in the national multi-operator self-exclusion scheme”.

The obligation has teeth, and it has been tested. In April 2020 the Commission suspended the licences of two online operators for failing to integrate the scheme by the 31 March deadline, under section 118(2) of the Gambling Act 2005, and the Commission’s expectation that customer bases are checked at least every 24 hours dates from the same month. Since then, a licence and an exemption from the scheme have been mutually exclusive categories. An operator described as “licensed” and “not on Gamstop” is one of two things: a site licensed elsewhere and marketed at British players, or a mistake in a list. There is no third option, and no legal route to one.

The Self-Exclusion Question, Answered Without a Sales Pitch

The question arrives in a dozen phrasings and deserves one clear reply. Registering with Gamstop Online, the scheme renamed from GAMSTOP in November 2025, blocks a person from gambling with all online gambling companies licensed in Great Britain for a chosen term of 6 months, 1 year, 5 years or 5 years with auto-renewal. Signing up takes a few minutes, and it can take up to 24 hours for the block to become effective. Once registered, the registration cannot be cancelled or deactivated during the exclusion period, and the exclusion stays in place after the end of the chosen period unless the person contacts Gamstop to remove it. Registrations cannot be removed early.

If nothing is done after the chosen period, the data is held through a further automatic seven-year self- exclusion period during which operators are told the person was previously excluded; under the terms of use, the auto-renewal option may be turned off only during the final six months of a five-year minimum term. That is the fact, and it is the reason a blocked person looking for somewhere else to play is looking at a different kind of site rather than an equivalent one: no licence, no 24-hour base check, no 6,000-call contact centre recording complaints, and no obligation not to market to them while they are excluded.

The land-based schemes are separate and worth knowing about, because they explain why the scheme’s own figures move. SENSE covers licensed land-based casinos, with a minimum six-month period extendable to twelve months, removal only in person at a casino during the six-month “Thinking” period that follows, and a 24-hour cooling-off period; the Commission’s May 2026 freedom of information response put active SENSE self-exclusions at 12,445 between 1 April 2025 and 1 April 2026. Gamstop Betting Shops, formerly MOSES, is telephone-based, runs a fixed 12-month term that cannot be ended early, and recorded 9,075 active self-exclusions over the same period. Arcades use schemes run by BACTA and Boomerang Digital, and bingo clubs one run by the Bingo Association.

If any of that paragraph describes a situation someone is in, the help is immediate and free. GamCare’s National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 is staffed 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, with live chat and WhatsApp through the same number; callers in Wales are given 0808 2819 265. Gam-Anon UK & Ireland supports family and friends, and Citizens Advice Scotland’s Gambling Support Service runs an advice line on 0800 328 1131, Monday to Friday, 10am to 3pm. The Helpline is not a crisis line and cannot transfer someone at immediate risk, but it will know who can.

What All of This Adds Up To

The question of which casinos sit outside the scheme is easy and the answer is unhelpful: all of them that matter, because none of them are licensed here, and the protections a British player takes for granted — a scheme check every 24 hours, a £5 slots stake cap, a 10x wagering ceiling, no reverse withdrawals since 31 October 2021, and a named alternative dispute resolution provider when things go wrong — exist only on the licensed side of the line. The players who use the register in numbers, 117,756 new registrations in 2025 and a record 12,236 in May 2026, are evidence that the licensed market’s rules have teeth. Their willingness to look elsewhere is evidence that teeth are not always comfortable. Both facts are true, and a phone makes the second one easier to act on than it has ever been.

GamCare’s National Gambling Helpline: 0808 8020 133, free, 24 hours a day, every day of the year.

Last checked: 12 November 2026.

Content created by the «Quick Withdrawal» team